Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 22, 10:28 am, "Kevin Hastings"
wrote: I bought one of these at a hamfest from a SK's estate and thought it was a ARX-2 and then noticed the 52" coax harness attached to it and realized that it was probably a ARX-2B which seems to be the same except for the 3 radials which I guess didn't get sent to the hamfest. Reviews of these 2 antennas seem to almost use the 2 model numbers interchangeably so the question is... Is it worth making up a radial system and taking another 5 feet of mast to re-manufacture this thing into a ARX-2B? Absolutely. What would be the advantage? Maybe somebody's used both. Yep, I had a ARX-2 which I converted to a 2B. I did tests to see the difference. It was large. What the deal is... That extra section is mainly a decoupling device. This decouples the antenna from the feedline, which can skew the pattern upwards off the horizon. Gain is useless if it's pointing towards Jupiter... You don't need any more mast per say. The radial set clamps to the existing mast you are using now. The 50 inch coax section connects from the feedpoint to that radial set. I made all the parts to convert mine myself but I imagine you can order them from cushcraft. MK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ringo | CB | |||
Ringo Ranger II | Antenna | |||
"Deal with the Devil"? (KUSC, Clear Channel deal) | Broadcasting |