Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
back again art?? still stuck on 'equilibrium'??? 'equilibrium' is a nice
catch word. and yes, many 'masters' heartily believed that everything had to be in 'equilibrium' with something or another. but we have come a long way since then. there can be no energy flow between things in equilibrium, and we all know there is energy flowing in antenna elements. if there wasn't they wouldn't radiate. and we can directly measure it with current and voltage probes. so while maybe the static case of coulomb's law may be said to represent 'equilibrium', none of the others needs that... in fact none of the others would exist if everything was in 'equilibrium'. the current, curl, and d/dt parts of the equations are all a representation of non-equilibrium conditions that must exist for those equations to be of any use. so get out of the 19th century and into the 21st and join the rest of us in the understanding of the dynamic world around us! "art" wrote in message ups.com... For full understanding of how Maxwells laws were generated one has to check if eny proviso's were written in. Ffor instance I suspect that there was a proviso for equilibrium in every law thar Maxwell used for his summation ofr laws there was an exceptance by all the masters that without equilibrium the who univere would fall apart. Some where along the line somebody deviated from this proviso and made the assumption that at every point on a radiator can be seen as a sino soidal current that causes radiation because the assumption was needed to conform with Maxwells laws while ignoring the dictae of the masters that the laws of the universe is bound by by equilibrium so the assumption was conncocted to "solve" the 1/2 wave problem. Can anybody versed in the art point to one of the many laws at his time were not based on equilibrium. In other words did any of the work he used specifically addres things that were NOT in equilibrium to justify its use for items not in equilibrium to substantiate the use of Maxwells laws to derive its function. Being a mechanical engineer I am not well informed of all the doings of the masters TIA Art KB9MZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another act of Republican "these laws are for everyone but us": | Shortwave | |||
SCANNER EAVESDROPPING LAWS | Swap | |||
Scanning laws around the world? | Scanner | |||
Scanner Laws | Scanner |