Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:48:48 GMT, Gene Fuller
wrote: However, the combined efficiency of the two antennas is about 65%. As a result, each transmitter only has to produce a forward power of about 38 kW for WWVB to produce its effective radiated power of 50 kW." The NIST folks could probably increase the efficiency to greater than 90% if they dug a large pit to temporarily store the decaying electrons. All of those dying electrons lying on the ground tend to discourage the active electrons from working as hard as they could. The efficiency could be raised to nearly 100% if the two helices were wound in opposite directions. That would provide the best shot at equilibrium. Hi Gene, You shave points too close. They could achieve 130% efficiency if they simply tapped into the current return on the inside of the wire. Arthur's 3dB here and 3dB there, if you use enough wire, then you are beginning to talk about GAIN! Also, Fort Collins is a higher altitude than Podunk Illinois, so impedance is less than 377 Ohms too! High gain, maybe 129% efficient. ***** irony mode off ******** Load resistance seen by the transmitters is roughly 0.85 Ohm transformed to 50 Ohms. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What antenna for receiving video signal from ISS ? | Antenna | |||
Need some help designing a receiving antenna | Antenna | |||
Best Antenna for Receiving - NEWBIE | Antenna | |||
Readily available 10MHz divide by 96 10MHz down counter | Homebrew | |||
Readily available 10MHz divide by 96 10MHz down counter | Homebrew |