Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm in Richmond, Virginia and I'm trying to noticeably improve my reception of WWV's 10MHz signal from Fort Collins, Colorado. It all seemed so simple, two weeks ago: wind some wire, solder a connector, and Hey...presto! a clean WWV signal. grin! It wasn't so simple, and I'm afraid I've let it become an "ego thing" (see also: resource sink). I've outlined the problem below in the hope that someone can either suggest something I haven't already tried, or even point out something really dumb that I've been doing and shouldn't keep doing. grin! Background ---------- Several years back I inherited a Heathkit GCW-1001 Most Accurate Clock II from my father. This is an update to it's predecessor, Heath's GC-1000 Most Accurate Clock; its circuit, built around a Philips TDA1072A AM receiver IC and an 87C52 microprocessor, monitors WWV's 10MHz signal and decodes the BCD-coded 100Hz subcarrier (details at http://tf.nist.gov/stations/wwv.html) to keep the MAC-II accurate. This MAC-II worked fine for my father: he had a 30 meter dipole of some kind in the attic, above the second floor of a house on a hill. For him, WWV's 10MHz signal from Fort Collins came in regular as... well, "clockwork". igg! For me, in a one-story-plus-basement, in a low spot in a river valley, it's a different story. The GCW-1001 has a stack-o-LEDs signal strength indicator driven by the TDA1072's AGC output; it would wander between 2 and 4 LEDs with my 40" indoor dangling wire antenna, and it could take weeks or months for atmospheric conditions to randomly improve the signal to where the GCW-1001 could "lock in" a time. Two weeks ago, in a fit of madness, I decided to try building a better antenna, one which would let the clock lock onto WWV at least, say, once a week. The tuned-loop antenna I've built _has_ increased the signal -- I'm seeing 4-5 LEDs lit on a regular basis, and 6 on occasion -- but the clock still isn't sync'ing to WWV's time signal. The clock face remains at a cute(?) 7-segment "not SEt" display. And what seems to be louder is the carrier -- or _a_ carrier, at any rate -- but not the tones or the human voice time callout coming out of the GCW-1001's speaker. I seem to be up to my assets in alligators, and the swamp doesn't seem to be draining much. Problem ------- My main problem is that, although the GCW-1001's LED "Signal" stack _says_ it's getting a stronger signal, what I hear through the speaker monitor isn't _clearer_. There are long periods when I cannot hear any WWV tones through the GC-1001's speaker, the tones/ticks are faint even when there are 5-6 LEDs lit, and the voice is almost never audible/distinguishable. The clock _seems_ to be sync-ing a little more often (it's done it four times in the past two weeks), but I had hoped it might happen a _little_ more frequently. Am I asking too much? Is WWV's 10MHz signal from (say) 2,000 miles away, simply too weak to pick up solidly without an outdoor antenna? What I've tried --------------- My (second) attempt at a 30m indoor loop antenna: Main loop (tuned): A 36" near-circle of #12 insulated house wire with an AM/FM tuning capacitor across it. Pickup loop: One (36") turn of #27 magnet wire taped to the #12 loop with electrical tapegrin!. The ends (scraped and tinned) are tied to the GCW-1001's 50ohm antenna input with a couple of 12" clip leads and a 3' section of coax. The loops are mounted on (and held in shape by) a 1'x4'x0.5" "backboard" made of "blue foam" house insulation that I found in my basement; the loops are held in place by small plastic cable ties. The foam backing is resting against a (roughly) N-S wall, which _should_ orient the loop plane across the WWV wavefront for maximum pickup. Does this sound like a reasonable attempt at a tuned 10MHz loop? Is there any reason to believe that the foam backing would affect the loop inductance? I'm assuming it's a good insulator and nothing more, but that's an assumption. Is it possible that I'm picking up a non-WWV dignal so strong that it's masking WWV? I tried tuning around 10MHz with a shortwave radio; it didn't find WWV -- not a particularly hopeful sign -- but it did pick up a station called (IIRC) WWCR. WWCR's 'web site (www.wwcr.com) lists its transmitter #4 as using 9.985MHz and 9.975MHz between 0900 and 2100 CST. Any advice or suggestions will be appreciated, up to and including "You can't power a hedge trimmer from two AAA cells!". Thanks... Frank McKenney, McKenney Associates Richmond, Virginia / (804) 320-4887 Munged E-mail: frank uscore mckenney ayut minds pring dawt cahm (y'all) -- Physics is mathematical not because we know so much about the physical world, but because we know so little; it is only its mathematical properties that we can discover. -- Bertrand Russell -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What antenna for receiving video signal from ISS ? | Antenna | |||
Need some help designing a receiving antenna | Antenna | |||
Best Antenna for Receiving - NEWBIE | Antenna | |||
Readily available 10MHz divide by 96 10MHz down counter | Homebrew | |||
Readily available 10MHz divide by 96 10MHz down counter | Homebrew |