Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Oct, 11:51, John Smith wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: ... speaking of, and why do you consider them "experts"? Roy Lewallen, W7EL YEAH! And besides, "Where's the beef?" ;-) JS Actually John my beef is that the rule for the most efficient radiation is that "if a radiating element is resonant and in equilibrium it can be of any shape, size or elevation". Yet that is ignored by the so called experts of the amateur ranks. I can only assume that most think themselves as being experts that they do not find a need to get up from the couch and try things knowing that there is no room for surprises over their own superior brain power. How many would admit that :for a given polarization the best results are NOT at right angles or parallel to earth" ? And as somebody said "If it was really true it would have been invented a long time ago" as if all discoveries have their own time scale for discovery and time has expired for antennas Art KB9MZ....XG Art KB9MZ over their thoughts. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|