Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Derek" wrote
so you are saying that as all the afore mentioned came to the same conclusion, there is no possibility they were 'all' wrong?, if that is the case then all is known and there is no point in trying to prove otherwise as there is nothing left to learn. I think not. _____________ The fundamentals of EM radiation are defined by natural laws, which even 50 years ago were rather well understood. New antenna designs always will be possible, but all of them of necessity must be based on, and follow natural law. RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|