Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Miller wrote:
Maybe one could say the ground side of the balanced line and its dipole quarter wave are acting as an elevated counterpoise to the "random wire" on the other side? Antenna systems are often a lot easier to analyze and understand if you put aside concepts like "counterpoise" and "ground". An antenna is a two terminal device, even if it's "end fed". The transmitter is also a two terminal device. Connect the two together and you have an electrical circuit. Like any circuit, the current leaving one terminal has to equal the current going into the other terminal. So what happens with an end fed antenna? Well, whatever the current going into the antenna (and current must go into it, since the power into it is I^2 * R, where R is the sum of radiation and loss resistance), an equal and opposite current must go somewhere else. If you succeed in completely choking off the current going somewhere else, you've also succeeded in choking off the current going to the antenna. So you don't want to do that. Conductors don't care what label you put on them -- calling one a "ground" or "counterpoise" doesn't give it magical properties. When a current flows on a conductor, it creates a field. This field will radiate unless canceled by other fields. So the "somewhere else" that the current flows is just as much an antenna as the supposed antenna is. If the current has nowhere else to go, it'll go down the outside of the coax, which will effectively become the other half of a dipole. If you choke off the current on the outside of the coax, it'll go somewhere else if it can. But if there is no other place, then the current to the antenna will drop -- the feedpoint impedance will increase. If the current goes into two or more radial wires which are symmetrically placed, the fields from the wires will largely (but not completely) cancel, so the net radiation from the radials will be small. This can reasonably called a "counterpoise" -- a place for the current to flow without creating much radiation. Or you can connect the antenna to a buried radial field ("ground"), which behaves much the same way, but with even better field cancellation. But people often put these names on other configurations, expecting the currents or fields to behave differently than on other conductors. But the things to remember are that all antennas have two terminals, and the current into one equals the current out of the other. And current flowing along any conductor creates a field, whether you consider it to be an "antenna" or not. Keeping this in mind helps a lot in understanding end fed and other antennas. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
dipole question | Antenna | |||
Low dipole performance question | Antenna | |||
Dipole question | CB | |||
Answer to Dipole Double-Resonance Problem | Antenna | |||
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? | Antenna |