Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 16, 8:19 pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
Thanks for the comments. Once again, I scanned a posting too hastily, and somehow missed the "transmitter" part. My comments were appropriate for a receiving antenna, not transmitting. So let me try to answer both Tom's and Mark's postings more appropriately. None of us has a constant current source with which to drive an antenna, but generally a source with a fixed amount of power and a finite source impedance. If we did have a constant current source, then yes, adding more and more ferrite cores would result in more and more power being delivered by the source, a larger and larger fraction of which would be dissipated in the ferrite. A 1 megohm resistor would get a bundle of power from our source, and a 10 megohm resistor would get 10 times as much. If we have a tuner, we can adjust our source impedance over some range. Provided that the feedpoint impedance is within that range with the ferrites in place, we can deliver all our power to the ferrite-antenna combination. I believe that the fraction of the power applied to the antenna which ends up in the ferrites monotonically increases as we add ferrites (assuming we don't move the previously added ones). If the ferrites were all at the base, the equivalent load circuit would be just two impedances in series -- the ferrite impedance and the antenna feedpoint impedance, and it would behave as Tom said. But putting the ferrite cores anywhere but the base changes the antenna current distribution, which has a potentially complex effect on the feedpoint impedance other than just adding the transformed impedance of the core. This means that not only does Tom's Z3 increase as we add ferrites, but Z1 changes also. Roy Lewallen, W7EL thanks for the replies... so for talking purposes: Z1 is the antenna feedpoint Z and we will define "antenna" as the exposed wire after the end of the ferrite tube. Z2 is the Z of the wire passing though the ferrite Z3 is the source Z which I will stipulate is 50 Ohms OK as we add ferrite to the antenna, Z1 changes because the antenna is getting shorter as the ferrite is getting longer. i.e. if there is 7" of ferrite, then there is only 12" of exposed antenna and it is elevated over the ground plane so Z1 is going up. In the end case, when the ferrite is 19" there is no antenna Z1 becomes infinity. Then looking into the base (thinking as lumped elements), we have Z2 + Z1. Since Z1 is infinity, the base must look like infinity, but this does not pass common sense. In other words, what is the Z looking into a 19" wire that is inside 19" of ferrite. Thinking in lumped element terms, it would be very high and little power will flow. Thinking in distributed terms there will be some relatively low Z looking into the base, power will flow and the ferrite will dissipate heat. The base Z would be related to some property of the ferrite like the property of free space has a Z of 377. What is that propery and what would a typical Z be? Mark |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ABOUT - RF Noise (RFI/EMF) and Ferrite Chokes plus More Reading . . . | Shortwave | |||
What are ferrite core chokes to improve radio reception? | Shortwave | |||
Ferrite chokes. | Shortwave | |||
FS: snap on RFI chokes ferrite suppressors | Boatanchors | |||
FS: snap on RFI chokes ferrite suppressors | Swap |