Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Highland Ham wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: Good advice. In antenna applications, we need to strive to keep the flux density low enough that ferrites behave essentially linearly. If we don't, harmonic generation will result. ============================ A question : Is the above the reason why current baluns wound on a ferrite toroid with ,say, a total of 10 windings , can be best made by having 5 windings wound in 1 direction and the other 5 in the opposite direction ? No. You probably mean "regressive" winding, where you wind half the turns, cross the wire to the other side of the core, and wind the remaining turns in the other direction (but the same sense) around the core. If you wind half the turns in each sense (half where you pass the wire downward through the center of the core each turn and half where you pass it upward), you'll end up with nearly zero impedance and a very poor balun. The advantage of the "regressive" winding technique is that it reduces the end-to-end capacitance of the winding. I've found that with high Q inductors (but ones operating well below self resonance) it typically improves the Q by around 10 - 15% or so, which is usually not worth the trouble. With the sorts of ferrites commonly used for baluns, Q is typically one or less over the operating frequency range, so "regressive" winding makes no difference at all. In any case, it makes no difference in core flux density. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ABOUT - RF Noise (RFI/EMF) and Ferrite Chokes plus More Reading . . . | Shortwave | |||
What are ferrite core chokes to improve radio reception? | Shortwave | |||
Ferrite chokes. | Shortwave | |||
FS: snap on RFI chokes ferrite suppressors | Boatanchors | |||
FS: snap on RFI chokes ferrite suppressors | Swap |