Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote in
: .... The advantage of the "regressive" winding technique is that it reduces the end-to-end capacitance of the winding. I've found that with high Q inductors (but ones operating well below self resonance) it typically improves the Q by around 10 - 15% or so, which is usually not worth the trouble. With the sorts of ferrites commonly used for baluns, Q is typically one or less over the operating frequency range, so "regressive" winding makes no difference at all. In any case, it makes no difference in core flux density. .... Another advantage is that it may be convenient to have the winding end on opposite sides of the core... often the case for fitting a balun to a box with input on one side and output on the other. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ABOUT - RF Noise (RFI/EMF) and Ferrite Chokes plus More Reading . . . | Shortwave | |||
What are ferrite core chokes to improve radio reception? | Shortwave | |||
Ferrite chokes. | Shortwave | |||
FS: snap on RFI chokes ferrite suppressors | Boatanchors | |||
FS: snap on RFI chokes ferrite suppressors | Swap |