| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
October 26th 07, 12:58 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST
On Oct 26, 1:43 am, Sum Ting Wong wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:02:12 -0400, Art Clemons wrote: I'm waiting to read on here that I've mis-understood a great method of measuring HF mobile antennas, but absent a troll or two, I don't expect to. Yeah, that was ugly. I also noticed the author used what appeared to be a base loaded motorized antenna and then concluded that the motorized antennas weren't worth a hoot. There are some decent center loaded ones out there that would have given better results. Base loaded antennas are probably the worst possible case, based on my experience. Wonder how that article made it past the editor? S.T.W. Publish or perish? denny |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A comparison of the DA100E with the AmRad active antennas. | Shortwave | |||
| E-bay...Are we supposed to believe everything? | Shortwave | |||
| Viking antennas by Childs Electronics ? Comparison ? | CB | |||
| Comparison of three indoor active antennas | Shortwave | |||
| mobile antenna impedance comparison | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
