Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTW, here is the email I sent to QST after reading that article...
************************************************** ********************* I know that as a business owner that customers only say something when they are not happy... As your customer I have to say that the QST article comparing various mobile antenna configurations appears to be a bad decision... The methodology is non existant and the information imparted is thin gruel indeed... I can only assume you are having problems finding articles elementary enough to satisfy your target membership of new hams who have rudimentary technical knowledge... Let me urge you to return with us now to those thrilling days of yesteryear when QST set a technical standard and stimulated the young hams reading it to learn and understand, rather than simply sliding down to our level... Success and leadership is not exclusively defined by circulation numbers - rather it is more defined by the standing and esteem it is held in by the rest of the amateur, technical, and professional community... ************************************************** ******************************* denny / k8do |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A comparison of the DA100E with the AmRad active antennas. | Shortwave | |||
E-bay...Are we supposed to believe everything? | Shortwave | |||
Viking antennas by Childs Electronics ? Comparison ? | CB | |||
Comparison of three indoor active antennas | Shortwave | |||
mobile antenna impedance comparison | Antenna |