Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Coslo" wrote in message I've been pleased so far. I worked some CA QSO party from the middle of PA on 20 meters with it, and all I could hear I could work (100 watts) While you can not work a station if you can not hear it, that is no way to compair an antenna. I have an off center fed antenna up 45 feet and a tribander up 57 feet. I can hear more on the beam than I can on the OCF . I can probably work all I can hear on either antenna. It is I just hear beter on the beam on the bands it is cut for. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph Mowery wrote:
"Michael Coslo" wrote in message I've been pleased so far. I worked some CA QSO party from the middle of PA on 20 meters with it, and all I could hear I could work (100 watts) While you can not work a station if you can not hear it, that is no way to compair an antenna. I have an off center fed antenna up 45 feet and a tribander up 57 feet. I can hear more on the beam than I can on the OCF . I can probably work all I can hear on either antenna. It is I just hear beter on the beam on the bands it is cut for. Its not meant to be a definitive test of the antenna, but I have used some antennas where that was not the case, Hopefully this is not the sort of group where one has to take their antenna to a range before they are allowed to comment on it, good or bad. I used it, and didn't have trouble making contacts. Others can determine if it works or not according to their own guidelines. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 11:51 am, Michael Coslo wrote:
It is narrow, but that's only been a big problem on 80. I've seen some on 80 where the people would tune them at driving speeds because the leaning back of the antenna would detune far enough to be a problem. :/ They didn't have a wide enough bandwidth to really get both positions with a good match. Good performing antenna though. How well mine does depends on the path, distance, etc.. On 40m, mine will beat my dipole which is at 35-40 ft on paths over about 1000 miles or so late at night. IE: Houston to Florida. We tested that many times to make sure it was not a fluke. I have no trouble on 80, but it also varies with time of day, distance. It's probably at it's worst real early in the evening to close NVIS range stations. But as it gets later, it will usually get better and better once the band gets stable and stretches out a bit. As usual, the longer the path, the better it might do vs a med height dipole. But I'm often pretty strong even to NVIS range stations. Not uncommon to be over S 9.. Sometimes 10-20 over.. Course, all the guys on dipoles might be hitting them at 30-40 over.. :/ But no problem talking. And I've never run an amp mobile.. Just 100w.. MK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A comparison of the DA100E with the AmRad active antennas. | Shortwave | |||
E-bay...Are we supposed to believe everything? | Shortwave | |||
Viking antennas by Childs Electronics ? Comparison ? | CB | |||
Comparison of three indoor active antennas | Shortwave | |||
mobile antenna impedance comparison | Antenna |