Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph Mowery wrote:
"Michael Coslo" wrote in message I've been pleased so far. I worked some CA QSO party from the middle of PA on 20 meters with it, and all I could hear I could work (100 watts) While you can not work a station if you can not hear it, that is no way to compair an antenna. I have an off center fed antenna up 45 feet and a tribander up 57 feet. I can hear more on the beam than I can on the OCF . I can probably work all I can hear on either antenna. It is I just hear beter on the beam on the bands it is cut for. Its not meant to be a definitive test of the antenna, but I have used some antennas where that was not the case, Hopefully this is not the sort of group where one has to take their antenna to a range before they are allowed to comment on it, good or bad. I used it, and didn't have trouble making contacts. Others can determine if it works or not according to their own guidelines. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A comparison of the DA100E with the AmRad active antennas. | Shortwave | |||
E-bay...Are we supposed to believe everything? | Shortwave | |||
Viking antennas by Childs Electronics ? Comparison ? | CB | |||
Comparison of three indoor active antennas | Shortwave | |||
mobile antenna impedance comparison | Antenna |