Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
Jimmie D wrote: I once saw a demonstration that "BIG UGLY" cb antennas, these are approximately 1/8 wl and have a huge loading coil, have more gain than a 1/4 wl radiator. This certaily appeared to be the case when both the antenna being test and the field strength meter's antenna were both the "big ugly" variety and relatively close together(50'). Could this "gain" be a result of magnetic coupling between the coils or was some other trickery being performed. There's no doubt this was some sort of trickery. I'd bet any amount of money that if properly measured, the loaded 1/8 wave antenna would be shown to have less gain due to lower efficiency. Even moderately accurate antenna gain measurements are much more difficult to make than most people realize, and there are many ways to be fooled. I couldn't begin to list the all ways you could set up a demonstration like that to get whatever result you desired. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Roy For the sake of my continuing education what would I need in terms of minimum equipment to make a meaningful comparison between antennas? Just to keep it simple I'm working on two meters and seventy five centimeters so far in my EMCOM prep work. -- Tom Horne, W3TDH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A comparison of the DA100E with the AmRad active antennas. | Shortwave | |||
E-bay...Are we supposed to believe everything? | Shortwave | |||
Viking antennas by Childs Electronics ? Comparison ? | CB | |||
Comparison of three indoor active antennas | Shortwave | |||
mobile antenna impedance comparison | Antenna |