| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil Moore wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: I don't think it matters where it is, or how much space is involved. For a single source to create an interferernce pattern, there must be a reflector somewhere. An antenna tuner for example. Interference is the result of the overlap of waves. Do you consider a dipole in free space to be a "single source"? There is no reflector yet there is plenty of interference. If there is no reflector and no splitter to redirect a portion of the ratiated energy, but an interference pattern still results, then there must be more than a single source. It should be fairly obvious that both parts of the antenna must be present in order to generate the dipole-type interference pattern. 73, ac6xg |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|