Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:30:26 -0800, "Sal M. Onella"
wrote: So, when you were on staff at USN ET "A" School, where we both taught, did you know better than the "reflected power" legend/old-wives-tale/heresy? Hell, that's where I first picked it up !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hi John, My path up through "A" school was through the Radar branch (I was the only ETR2 in the Communications Branch when I taught there). The Radar training gave us hands on experience with equipment that presented both lumped (pulse forming network) AND line (Magic T and such) designs. Also, reflected POWER was palpably lethal in both applications. Melodramatic criticism of the fine points in terminology carried little weight in lab exercises. Luckily, I had the presence of mind as a student to hie myself into Frisco to buy Terman's "Electronic and Radio Engineering." The Navy course of instruction and training manuals so perfectly dove-tailed to that book that the fit was a precision match. The "A" school syllabus didn't go nearly to the depth of detail as offered by Terman (the ET1&2 and ETC course work did), but it did heavily touch every chapter found in that tome. Insofar as heresy, the syllabus was rife with it. We taught that antennas that were too short could be made to appear longer by the addition of the "missing" wire in the form of a coil. Similarly, a too long antenna could be reduced in length by inserting a capacitor. The teaching aid was to think of the coil symbol as a spring that could be stretched to lengthen the short antenna, and cap symbol as providing space enough between the plates to collapse the extra length of a too long antenna. Clearly the metaphors wheeze, but are effective well beyond mathematical proofs that could only serve as sleeping pills. Before the purists roll their eye's and mutter "tut-tut" under their beards - instruction was complete to point out these were short-cuts as memory aides and did not serve as a complete discussion on the topic. Reflected power certainly fell into that category as its hazard was positively destructive and not a mental exercise subjected to debate in a perfumed symposium. Anyone with radar experience can fashion the plumbing to steer reflected power to any load. -um- reflected energy be damned at that point as any reflection was inherently returning to a source that was long dormant (in terms of microseconds) and ready to dissipate anything that came down the pipe. The whole point of the magnetron's success in war was its robustness in the face of catastrophic mismatches. The PFN might flame out or the thyratron burst, but the magnetron would survive. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|