Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() You are simply comparing two verticals. I don't see why you say that. One is mounted on the ground with 16 radials, the other is simply 2 pcs of wire up 60 feet, with 120 degree included angle in my example, although I can change the angle just by typing over top of the 120 I can make it anything I want. My point was, a lot of people think that if they put up a vertical, even taking care to put a good radial field under it, and they get a low angle of radiation, they have the ultimate single element DX antenna. In fact, when you take losses into consideration a simple inverted vee beats it at all angle over 10 degrees and equals it below 10 degrees. I think that is a pretty significant statement. Rick K2XT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Soil dielectric constand and conductivity for East Texas | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna | |||
Ground rods in rocky soil | Antenna |