Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Nov, 15:33, "Richard Fry" wrote:
"art" wrote Antenna books say the pattern is a figure eight! How can that be? When the energy removes itself from distributed capacitance do the photon march along the antenna in an orderly fashion? or do they rush out as if the movie in the capacitor is over? _________ Your intuitive theories may not support this, Arthur, but haven't you noticed that your linear, dipole antennas (whether "short" or 1/2-wave) transmit and receive very poorly in the directions of their longitudinal axis? In fact, radio direction finders make use of this proven reality of radiation physics. How do you explain this, if you believe that the radiation pattern/gain of a dipole is not very low in those directions, as in the nulls of a figure 8, and as easily measured for these antenna configurations on a good test range? Please post your supporting math(s). RF Ofcourse there is no radiation off the ends. What ever is sitting on the antenna can only fall off one side or the other. As far as the math goes you are not conversant enough with math to get involved. You could redeem your self by pointing out the deliberate mistake made by Dr John E Davis and become an overnight guru. Just think up another lie nobody will challenge you! Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Distributed capacitance effects Q? | Antenna | |||
"On Target" now being distributed | Shortwave | |||
Capacitance Meter ???? | Homebrew | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna |