Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote in message ...
Mark Keith wrote: If you are using the vertical for long haul, the increased received noise is a non issue. Actually, that's when an s-7 noise level is the biggest issue. Most long haul signals are below s-7. The signals will override the noise. IE: the noise might be 2 s units higher, but the signal increase over the low dipole will likely be more than that. The vertical still wins overall. Bottom line: Verticals are essentially useless in Madisonville, TX and, to the best of my knowledge, all hams here are forced to use horizontally polarized antennas. Anyone who wants a nice 33 foot long vertical, come on over and haul it away for free. Drilling out the pop rivets allows collapsing it to six feet long. Cecil, verticals are essentially useless...Have you tried link coupling to a vertcal? If that doesn't work then you could then add a picket fence even tho there will be a bit of capacitive loss. Regards Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Want K2BT "Ham Radio" articles on phasing verticals | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |