Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?
On 11 Nov, 06:15, wrote:
A lot of this 'discussion' depends on how you define 'efficiency'. A 'point source' can be very efficient, in it's self. It can also be very inefficient when compared to another type 'source'. It's true that any antenna can radiate all of the signal getting to it. The 'catch' is just how much 'signal' is getting to it and how/ where is it being radiated. If it's going to where you want it, and if a usable amount of 'signal' gets there, then it's efficient for that particular situation. If not... then it isn't very efficient, is it? - 'Doc (With the 'proper' mind-set, you can apply the above to anything, not just antennas.) I like that last comment regarding mind set. Just look how people are not viewing the subject without predisposition. No onw is willing to deal only what has been proffered to the exclusion of every thing else. Everybody will use a text gained from somewhere to side line true examination. Stephan,. you wanted out I took you at your word. I don't know how many times This discussion will end the same as always, I don't understand what you are saying To heck with mathematics. Iknow what I know is correct.sSme will change the content of what I state . And as always shown in history ridicule is turned to when all other efforts fail. But nobody will question the fact that all computor programs support my addition to Gaussian law to those of Maxweell. True, other scientists concluded that radiation is created via a time varience. No body has found correllation to prove it With a legitamate addition to a known law by Gauss I have given a method where as the hows of radiation is revealed that is consistent with Maxwells laws. The mathematics have been given that support it but they have been swept aside Existing programs support it but it is left to the user to determine whether "garbage in is garbage out" or to only accept what the program supplies with the appearance with known reality and junk the rest. And make no mistake about it, when programmers placed an assumed condition to a known law they did it with deliberation. When it supplied error they covered it up by changing the program to concurr with traditional thought. This is no different to when NASA ignored what engineers told them about O rings and science was pushed aside. Mathematical laws were broken and all that deal with these programs are part and parcel of this mathematical fraud. Best regards to all Art Unwin....KB9MZ...xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dumb Questions - Part II FRS | Equipment | |||
Dumb Questions - Part II FRS | Equipment | |||
WTB Zenith part/part radio | Swap | |||
WTB Transoceanic Part/Part radio | Boatanchors | |||
BEWARE SPENDING TIME ANSWERING QUESTIONS HERE (WAS Electronic Questions) | Antenna |