Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:33:10 GMT, "Nick" wrote:
Would it give more protection / solve the problem, if I encased it in a fibreglass yacht mast which I happen to have ? Hi Nick, No, it wouldn't. Make the antenna shorter, and surround it with taller, nearby grounded vertical conductors for the lightning to select in preference. For more protection, connect the tops of the taller conductors over the antenna. Of course, this advice reduces to putting the antenna in a grounded cage that takes the hit. Unfortunately it also renders the antenna deaf. Moral: Trying to stop the lightning from hitting your antenna also stops RF. [Hint: if you are going to stop it with a super glom of insulation, like fiberglass, consider that this insulation is inferior to a bajillion miles of air already there surrounding the antenna. That doesn't slow down lightning much does it?] 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:33:10 GMT, "Nick" wrote:
Hi, I want to install a vertical, fed with an SGC230 at the bottom, but concerned about minimising chance of a lightning strike on a bare conductor. Would it give more protection / solve the problem, if I encased it in a fibreglass yacht mast which I happen to have ? I plan it to be approx 40' high with the top 25' being a fibreglass yacht mast with the wire running up the inside. Top would be insulated / sealed so no ions could spray out, attracting a strike ... am I going the right way ? Thanks, Nick The popular solution seems to be the Alpha-Delta grounding antenna switches. Unfortunately, There does not seem to be one that can be operated remotely. John Ferrell W8CCW "Life is easier if you learn to plow around the stumps" |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 12, 8:33 am, "Nick" wrote:
Hi, I want to install a vertical, fed with an SGC230 at the bottom, but concerned about minimising chance of a lightning strike on a bare conductor. Would it give more protection / solve the problem, if I encased it in a fibreglass yacht mast which I happen to have ? I plan it to be approx 40' high with the top 25' being a fibreglass yacht mast with the wire running up the inside. Top would be insulated / sealed so no ions could spray out, attracting a strike ... am I going the right way ? Thanks, Nick Like they say, a vertical taller than any other object is fair game to lightning. Not really much you can do, except make sure that the return to earth at the base of the mast is very well grounded. You want it going to ground at the base of the antenna, and not at some later point along the feedline. I would snub the feedline to ground at the base, and run it along the ground the rest of the way to the shack. Then at the shack, use the usual "ground window" techniques with arresters, single point grounding, etc.. The only thing I can think of that "might" slightly reduce the chances of the antenna streaming would be to add a large "ball" at the top of the whip. Along the same line as flag poles. And even thats no sure thing. .. ![]() MK |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reducing effects of RF noise? | Shortwave | |||
Reducing RF noise interference? | Shortwave | |||
Reducing microphonics | Homebrew | |||
Reducing microphonics | Homebrew | |||
MFJ-9020 -- reducing WWV interference? | Equipment |