| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 12, 8:33 am, "Nick" wrote:
Hi, I want to install a vertical, fed with an SGC230 at the bottom, but concerned about minimising chance of a lightning strike on a bare conductor. Would it give more protection / solve the problem, if I encased it in a fibreglass yacht mast which I happen to have ? I plan it to be approx 40' high with the top 25' being a fibreglass yacht mast with the wire running up the inside. Top would be insulated / sealed so no ions could spray out, attracting a strike ... am I going the right way ? Thanks, Nick Like they say, a vertical taller than any other object is fair game to lightning. Not really much you can do, except make sure that the return to earth at the base of the mast is very well grounded. You want it going to ground at the base of the antenna, and not at some later point along the feedline. I would snub the feedline to ground at the base, and run it along the ground the rest of the way to the shack. Then at the shack, use the usual "ground window" techniques with arresters, single point grounding, etc.. The only thing I can think of that "might" slightly reduce the chances of the antenna streaming would be to add a large "ball" at the top of the whip. Along the same line as flag poles. And even thats no sure thing. .. ![]() MK |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Reducing effects of RF noise? | Shortwave | |||
| Reducing RF noise interference? | Shortwave | |||
| Reducing microphonics | Homebrew | |||
| Reducing microphonics | Homebrew | |||
| MFJ-9020 -- reducing WWV interference? | Equipment | |||