LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Report Post  
Old November 16th 07, 11:29 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2007
Posts: 182
Default RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:54:14 -0000, "Mike Kaliski"
wrote:

I guess you are skeptical that there might be a specific point on an
antenna
that matches the impedence of free space and thus radiates energy more
strongly than the rest of the antenna.


Hi Mike,

When your energy is frequency based, and your interface is large in
terms of wavelength (and anything over 1/10th wave is still large);
then trying to home in on a "specific" point is not very specific at
all.

This is the subject that interests me
and I intend to try and establish to my own satisfaction whether this is
or
is not the case.


You will probably be able to approach it by degrees, but as you get
closer focus has to be abandoned (classic wavelength vs. physical
length diffraction limitation).

If this can be established in a scientifically robust
manner, then I will present my experimental method, measurements and
conclusions for critical examination. I am unfamiliar with work that has
been carried out in this field, so I will carry out further searches and
reading before embarking on reinventing the wheel. Thanks for the link and
the suggestion about plasmonics and fields, I will follow up on that.


More towards the RF end of the scale, diffraction limits (being
broken) and your interest, consider:
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/17398

You can listen to others crow about how "someday" science will catch
up, or you can simply see that science has already left that crowd in
the dust. The article above (and others found by googling "Boeing,
and "negative refractance") will give you an RF material that turns
beams in the opposite direction of what would be expected.

Our crowing buddies would shrug this off (lack of experience in this
matter) because they don't realize that it solves the diffraction
limitation. Build your own model and throw RF against it yourself to
discover a lens with absolute (not fuzzy) focus.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Thank you Richard. I was aware of negative index refraction materials. Now
to make them sufficiently broadband and work at optical frequencies...

Cheers
Mike G0ULI

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fa- DECEMBER 1923 ISSUE of QST, Vol VII #5, NEAT! RLucch2098 Equipment 0 December 11th 03 03:25 AM
fa- DECEMBER 1923 ISSUE of QST, Vol VII #5, NEAT! RLucch2098 Equipment 0 December 11th 03 03:25 AM
fa- DECEMBER 1923 ISSUE of QST, Vol VII #5, NEAT! RLucch2098 Swap 0 December 11th 03 03:25 AM
FS:RSGB RadCom 1965-2003 Alf General 0 August 31st 03 08:21 PM
FS:RSGB RadCom 1965-2003 Alf General 0 August 31st 03 08:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017