Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:54:14 -0000, "Mike Kaliski" wrote: I guess you are skeptical that there might be a specific point on an antenna that matches the impedence of free space and thus radiates energy more strongly than the rest of the antenna. Hi Mike, When your energy is frequency based, and your interface is large in terms of wavelength (and anything over 1/10th wave is still large); then trying to home in on a "specific" point is not very specific at all. This is the subject that interests me and I intend to try and establish to my own satisfaction whether this is or is not the case. You will probably be able to approach it by degrees, but as you get closer focus has to be abandoned (classic wavelength vs. physical length diffraction limitation). If this can be established in a scientifically robust manner, then I will present my experimental method, measurements and conclusions for critical examination. I am unfamiliar with work that has been carried out in this field, so I will carry out further searches and reading before embarking on reinventing the wheel. Thanks for the link and the suggestion about plasmonics and fields, I will follow up on that. More towards the RF end of the scale, diffraction limits (being broken) and your interest, consider: http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/17398 You can listen to others crow about how "someday" science will catch up, or you can simply see that science has already left that crowd in the dust. The article above (and others found by googling "Boeing, and "negative refractance") will give you an RF material that turns beams in the opposite direction of what would be expected. Our crowing buddies would shrug this off (lack of experience in this matter) because they don't realize that it solves the diffraction limitation. Build your own model and throw RF against it yourself to discover a lens with absolute (not fuzzy) focus. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Thank you Richard. I was aware of negative index refraction materials. Now to make them sufficiently broadband and work at optical frequencies... Cheers Mike G0ULI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fa- DECEMBER 1923 ISSUE of QST, Vol VII #5, NEAT! | Equipment | |||
fa- DECEMBER 1923 ISSUE of QST, Vol VII #5, NEAT! | Equipment | |||
fa- DECEMBER 1923 ISSUE of QST, Vol VII #5, NEAT! | Swap | |||
FS:RSGB RadCom 1965-2003 | General | |||
FS:RSGB RadCom 1965-2003 | General |