On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:20:15 -0500, "Stefan Wolfe"
wrote:


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:34:34 -0500, "Stefan Wolfe"
wrote:

it is possible
for there to be a plus power differential from the sum of the source
powers
at any given segment as long as there is equal power subtracted at another
location.

Talking about taking Cecil's sucker bait. The string of conditionals
above should convince any rational mind that something in the
underlying premise is broken. - I explained this in another part of
the thread.

Hello Richard, with all due respect to your background on this, which is
much much greater than mine, I do have fundamental concepts that were
modeled in my mind many years ago at the University and even to some extent
in high school. No need to try to align me with other posters who I may
agree with, as you would political parties. Nobody is running for office
here. I tend to see no violations of physical laws provided they are held
true for the system as a whole, *provided you have defined a closed system*,
and he has. That is the way laws of science behave.

A largely rambling response. It describes, but doesn't actually
answer how
"a plus power differential from the sum of
the source powers at any given segment"
is so overly elaborate to be a fundamental concept supporting an
erroneous speculation Cecil is offering.

If you in fact think that the issue of accepting a broken argument is
on par with High School homecoming elections, that is not the race I
am competing in. If you want to stick with a technical issue in a
technical forum, then strict language and solid logic is still a
requirement.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC