Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sal M. Onella wrote:
I like 90% of these technical discussions. I'm a curious person by nature but I don't always know what doors to pull open, so it's nice when a good door is held open for me. It stands to reason that if interference is associated with a redistribution of EM wave energy in free space, essentially the same thing could happen in a transmission line. Incidentally, interference is also associated with the feedpoint impedance of a standing wave antenna. If the feedpoint impedance of a dipole is 50 ohms, that's a Z0 match to 50 ohm coax for an antenna supporting an SWR far in excess of 1:1. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is the Superposition Principle invalid? | Antenna |