| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Kelley wrote:
That should read "In the case of wave interference , the words don't mean that waves are 'doing things' to other waves." If waves are not 'doing things' to other waves, how are reflected waves eliminated by thin-films on glass? What happens to the reflection from the thin-film which has a reflectance of 0.01? If something is not done to that real reflection, it must still be there, but we can see that it is not there. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Is the Superposition Principle invalid? | Antenna | |||