mike3 wrote:
You are wrong too. He CAN "possibly" understand them, he does
not WANT to.

Sorry Mike, that is a lie. I sincerely want to
understand because that is the only way I can
learn. Nobody has offered any actual proof that
I am wrong. The absence of technical content of
your posting is prima facie evidence of the
ulterior motives in action here. Nice try at
obfuscation, but it doesn't work on intelligent,
knowledgeable people.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com