Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 17, 11:36 am, Tony Giacometti wrote:
Anyone familiar enough with receiving loops to be able to assist me in figuring out whats wrong here? TIA Tony I use a lot of solenoid loops. You should not need a preamp with a decent size loop using an R4C in most cases. I'm wondering if you are actually tuning the loop to resonance. Do you notice a sharp, fairly high Q peak of noise and signals at the point where you think it is tuned? There will be no mistake hearing this peak if it's working correctly. 400 pf seems kind of low to me... IE: lets take a regular solenoid loop, being calculated by Reg Edwards loop program rjeloop3.exe.. It's fairly accurate. I set up a one turn loop using a 20 mm wire, each side of the loop 5 ft, or 1525mm. I set 1900kc as the desired frequency, which is the middle of the band. It shows a stray capacitance of appx 9 pf, and requires appx 1350 pf to tune to 1900 kc. See my problem with your meager 400 pf? Of course, you using coax instead of plain wire may be effecting the results.. I'm just not sure if you are actually tuned. I have two solenoid loops that I often use. One is a 16 inch circle, and the other is a diamond loop 44 inches per side. The 16 inch loop uses appx 12 turns. The larger loop, 5 turns. I still use fairly large values of caps to drop down low in frequency. IE: a dual 365pf BC radio cap, with both gangs tied together is usually needed to cover the whole BC band. On my large loop, the various gangs of the cap add up to a good bit more than 730 pf.. More like 1000+ pf or so.. So I get a wider tuning range, and can switch gangs out to get small values for the higher bands. Anyway, when building small loops, you usually must build the loop around the cap at hand, rather than try to match the cap to a set number of wires. You would think a "planned" loop would work though.. Anyway, the first thing I would need to know is do you hear a sharp noise peak when "tuned"? You should. And you really should have enough signal to not need a preamp in most cases. As an example, the loss in comparing the 5 ft per side loop vs a 1/4 wave monopole is appx -21 db according to the program. "1900 kc" That should not be enough to kill you on the lower bands. I run both of my loops straight to my IC-706mk2g most of the time, and need no preamp at all on 160m or BC. And I don't have to enable the radio preamp either. It's possible you could have a problem with the preamp. :/ If you want to try a solenoid loop, here is the program. http://home.comcast.net/~nm5k/Rjeloop3.exe I put it on my server, as I forgot where the archive of all his files are.. A simple way to make a PVC frame is here.. http://home.comcast.net/~nm5k/loop5.jpg The loop you have should work ok once tuned, but there seems to be a problem of some kind. Is your feed line ground shield making a connection to the loop on the other side of the cap from the center pin connection? I use separate coupling loops on mine and the coax feeds that loop. The variable cap is connected in parallel across the main loop connections. I get better balance and cleaner nulls if I use a coupling loop vs feeding directly at the cap/loop connection. But of course, I'm not using a "shielded" loop to aid in balance. But in the end, I get just as clean nulls as the shielded loop. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Low Noise Receiving antennas | Antenna | |||
Receiving Loop | Antenna | |||
Receiving loop antenna design | Antenna | |||
Random Legth Receiving Only Ant.; Close Into A Loop ? | Antenna | |||
Technical question for receiving TV signals by a loop Antenna | Antenna |