Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Martes wrote:
"I have never been convinced that "impedance" is the ratio of force to response in any media." Jerry framed the question very nicely. The logic seems simple. More force is required when resistance to change is higher. When current is very small despite high force, it must be due to high resistance. Resistance proportional to force (volts) and inversely proportional to current (amps) seems perfectly logical to me. R=E/I Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |