Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
1/2 or more of the power received by a receiving antenna is re-radiated. Nearly all of the power received by a transmitting antenna is transmitted. Expanding a bit to make the receiving and transmitting systems symmetrical with respect to power: If the transmitter is linear (like the antenna is linear), i.e. Class-A, 1/2 or more of the generated power will be lost in the source. In a linear resonant system, about 1/2 of the power sourced reaches the antenna and about 1/2 of the received power makes it to the receiver. It's the old maximum power transfer theorem at work. A receiving antenna must be resonant to enable full acceptance of available energy, and it must be matched to avoid re-radiation of more than 50% of the energy it is able to grab. If off-resonance, the receiving antenna has too-high impedance for significant induced current. Of course, we have such good receivers we can do without good efficiency. A properly tuned antenna tuner ensures that the *antenna system* is resonant for both transmit and receive (assuming the receiver's input impedance is the same as the transmitter's output impedance). Note that an off-resonant antenna *wire* is integrated into a resonant antenna *system* through the use of an antenna tuner. Chapter 7 in _Reflections_II_ explains how even though it might better have been titled, "My Transmatch Really Does Tune My Antenna" *SYSTEM*. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"If the transmitter is linear (like the antenna is linear), i.e. Class-A, 1/2 or more of the generated power weill be lost in the source." True, that would be an equalizer between reception and transmitting system efficiencies of antennas, but Class A isn`t the only way to get linear amplification, Hi-Fi nuts to the contrary not withstanding. Class B is often used to combine efficiency with high undistorted output capability. Class B amplifiers are biased to cut-off so they draw no current when there is no signal input. A class B amplifier may have 60% efficiency at full power output, for example. Such an amplifier will have only about 30% efficiency at 1/2 of its maximum power output. Turman writes on page 354 of his 1955 edition: "With the largest signal that the (Class-B) amplifier can be expected to handle satisfactorily, Emin/Eb will be small, and the actual efficiency at full power is commonly of the order of 60%." The receiving antenna can never be more than 50% efficient due to re-radiation which I don`t seem to be able to explain. Sorry. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
The receiving antenna can never be more than 50% efficient due to re-radiation which I don`t seem to be able to explain. Sorry. It's because receiving antennas are linear devices which I don't seem to be able to explain. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |