| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Art, KB9MZ wrote:
"You can`t ever discard the factor Q in any discussion with respect to antenna efficiency or any calculation for that matter." Kraus writes in his 1950 edition of "Antennas" on page 299: "The Q of an antenna, like the Q of any resonant circuit, is proportional to the ratio of the energy stored to the energy lost (in heat or radiation) per cycle." (in heat or radiation) are Kraus` words, not mine. It means the R of the antenna used in the Q operations is formed of the sum of Rr+Rloss. Efficiency is Rr/Rr+Rloss The Q=X/R, where R is the sum of Rr+Rloss. If R is heavily weighted toward Rr, the antenna is efficient. If R is heavily weighted toward Rloss, the antenna is inefficient. Q as an indicator of efficiency is baloney. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
| Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
| 50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||