"art" wrote
W8JI is a competant engineer and well versed in "traditional"
antenna design but he is not without fault or error since
he is a human being. It is very worthwhile to read what
he has to say but if it doesn't agree on your thoughts
developed from first principles then you can't use the
info until the error is resolved. That is just like
reading a book without exercising discretion with
respect to the source.
_____________

art,

As presumably you, also, are a human being, then shouldn't we all consider
the peculiar, unproven, and unique beliefs you post here with the same
discretion applying to you as you suggest for the statements of W8JI (and
others)?

And that is being rather charitable, as W8JI is basing his analyses on
proven and repeatable physics, not on the speculations you continue to post,
and which no one else has offered the least bit of provable corroboration.

RF

On 27 Nov, 14:42, "Richard Fry" wrote:
"art" wrote W8JI is a competant engineer and well versed in "traditional"
antenna design but he is not without fault or error since
he is a human being. It is very worthwhile to read what
he has to say but if it doesn't agree on your thoughts
developed from first principles then you can't use the
info until the error is resolved. That is just like
reading a book without exercising discretion with
respect to the source.

_____________

art,

As presumably you, also, are a human being, then shouldn't we all consider
the peculiar, unproven, and unique beliefs you post here with the same
discretion applying to you as you suggest for the statements of W8JI (and
others)?

And that is being rather charitable, as W8JI is basing his analyses on
proven and repeatable physics, not on the speculations you continue to post,
and which no one else has offered the least bit of provable corroboration.

RF

What others think matters not to me. If I can follow thru from first
principles
of that which is stated then I am comfortable with it.
At the same time it is acknoweledged that radiation is still a mystery
to scientists
and I want to get to the bottom of things. If you are comfortable in
what you believe
then why the problem?

"art" wrote
At the same time it is acknoweledged that radiation
is still a mystery to scientists.
__________

Or just a mystery to you, perhaps?

Please quote the provable, scientific source(s) supporting an objective
research result showing that your stated belief that "radiation is still a
mystery" is valid.

RF

On 27 Nov, 17:05, "Richard Fry" wrote:
"art" wrote At the same time it is acknoweledged that radiation
is still a mystery to scientists.

__________

Or just a mystery to you, perhaps?

Please quote the provable, scientific source(s) supporting an objective
research result showing that your stated belief that "radiation is still a
mystery" is valid.

RF

I figured you were from the "All is known about antennas" group.
Why are you bothering with me when all is known?
We have nothing in common so why are you trying to advise me?
Why not educate the masses with respect to waves versus particles,
everybody will be very interested as to what emanates from a
radiator or visa versa when on the receiving end.Is it clones of
yourself that is needed to save the World?
As for you wanting me to quote something per your request,
you can forget all about that! I am not interested in
influencing your thoughts, What you have you can take to your
grave with complete confidence.

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:00:22 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:

Why not educate the masses with respect to waves versus particles,
everybody will be very interested as to what emanates from a
radiator or visa versa when on the receiving end.

How curious, Arthur, that I asked you for EXACTLY the same information
and you showed absolute repugnance towards the topic!

Already bored?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:42:27 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:

If I can follow thru from first
principles

Follow thru indeed.

This isn't rec.golf.clinic, and you can't even bogey the course. ;-)