Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Nov, 14:42, "Richard Fry" wrote:
"art" wrote W8JI is a competant engineer and well versed in "traditional" antenna design but he is not without fault or error since he is a human being. It is very worthwhile to read what he has to say but if it doesn't agree on your thoughts developed from first principles then you can't use the info until the error is resolved. That is just like reading a book without exercising discretion with respect to the source. _____________ art, As presumably you, also, are a human being, then shouldn't we all consider the peculiar, unproven, and unique beliefs you post here with the same discretion applying to you as you suggest for the statements of W8JI (and others)? And that is being rather charitable, as W8JI is basing his analyses on proven and repeatable physics, not on the speculations you continue to post, and which no one else has offered the least bit of provable corroboration. RF What others think matters not to me. If I can follow thru from first principles of that which is stated then I am comfortable with it. At the same time it is acknoweledged that radiation is still a mystery to scientists and I want to get to the bottom of things. If you are comfortable in what you believe then why the problem? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|