On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 16:58:14 -0500, "AI4QJ" wrote:

So out of all this dicsussion you made no point at all?

Hi Dan,

Yet you wholly ignore it when I explicitly stated "This is my
point.,," at the bottom (I won't repeat it here). Emotion ruling your
response?

A practical measurement that has current moving at 3*10E9m/sec, which on
the
surface may seem reasonable until you realize it is 10 times the speed of
light.

Aside from the probability of another math error nested into the space
of the sentence above;

Not a probability. I made such an error (decimal point) and ack'd it.

Read what remains in quote and responded quote above to discover you
haven't really responded to my comment at all.

it also presumes a lot of other, unstated
conditions that are arguable.

"a lot of..." "arguable''...Where's the facts?

Exactly, you provide no facts in the surviving quote above, merely the
suggestion as I explicitly describe:

I say "probable" because you introduce with the indefinite "a
practical measurement." instead of the definite "the practical
measurement."

Again, huh? There are many possible practical measurements. It is a plural,
not the singular demanded by you.

Exactly, and specifically TWO (2), possibly Cecil and Tom's; but you
can easily admit to many more given only you know what you meant by
what is quoted above. Your language indicates an indefinite practical
measurement. I am not responsible for what you write.

However, this is simply a cascade of your ill-considered responses
made in the emotional heat of argument. It is quite obvious that you
are still trying to work through the embarrassment of the decimal
point error that I had long ago let go of.

Can you please define the problem in English with no math? Deep abstractions
permitted (we know how to read).

I am not convinced of that you know how to read at all. It seems like
the period of 20 questions for me should be at end. Can you answer
your own last one? I mean, do you actually know what concept is being
struggled over? Everything to this point in my response pales in
comparison to finding out just what you are arguing in support of! Do
you know? or have you just got the numbers figured out?

I await in amusement and anticipation of your scribbling this response
that both Cecil and Art will immediately disown you for. Could it be
you who gets shoved out of the nest? ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC