Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 2, 12:19 am, "AI4QJ" wrote:
"AI4QJ" wrote in message The location on the monopole may make a difference. Since a standing wave is present, the location on the antenna will define the amount of current in the coil. Mounting near the feedpoint is at a high current point and this will increase ohmic losses. At approximately the center of the whip, the current (and ohmic loss) will be minimal. However, more inductance will be needed in the center location. thus more wire. More wire means more resistance. In spite of that, many say that the most efficient location is at near the center of the whip and intuitively I think this generally correct as long as you use heavy wire. It does make quite a difference. And this one one part that bugs me about the taper/delay dilemma. A coil loaded antenna actually needs more wire than the comparison 1/4 wave monopole. I used one of Reg's programs to churn some numbers up. "Vertload" The program is metric. I started with a 3m whip, and used a ..3 meter long loading coil, 100 mm diameter, which is close to four inches. The antenna was tuned for 3.800 mhz, and used 2 ohms as the ground loss. The coil came out to a 171 turns per meter, or a .17 dia/pitch ratio. This first example gave the total height of 3.3m tall overall, and the coil was at .01m from the base, and the stinger above the .3m long coil was 2.990m tall. I used 3m of whip regardless of the coil height. The base load version needed 51 turns of coil, which was 16.31 m of wire plus the 3m of the whip. 19.31 m of wire total. The efficiency was appx 14.49% vs the 1/4 wave. Then I tried a center load. To keep the same turn ratio, I had to use a longer coil. ..44m vs the .3m of the base load. Needed 75 turns, with a coil wire length of 23.92m. 26.92m total wire with the whip. The efficiency was 24.89 %. Then I tried an appx 2/3 coil level with 2m base whip, and 1m stinger. Again, to use the same coil stock, you would have to lengthen the coil to .53m vs the .3m of the base load. Would need 90 turns, with a wire length of 28.69m. 31.69m total wire length with the whip. The efficiency was 28.02 %. You actually need more wire than the equal 1/4 wave whip. Say a monopole at 3.8 mhz is 61.57 ft tall. The appx 9.84 ft whip base loaded needs 63.35 ft of wire. The center load needs 88.32 ft of wire. The 2/3 load needs 103.97 ft of wire. But it's the still most efficient of the three assuming no overly high coil resistance. To me, the coil current taper/delay, etc issue is basically a non issue. It doesn't really matter to me one way or the other as the design of the antennas will not change a whit. Of course, it's nice to know exactly how it happens, but it's not going to change the design of the short verticals as far as coil placement, etc. The optimum locations for those are already well known, and will not be effected no matter how thick the lather is whipped up on this NG.. :/ BTW, the optimum coil locations match the "lumped" theory so close as to make me wonder why anyone wastes so much energy worrying about it.. But.. That's just me. I have many things to do and worry about besides radios and antennas. So I choose what I do worry about with some care. ![]() This "problem" isn't one of them.. lol.. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|