Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 4, 1:26 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Owen Duffy wrote: I suspect that it is a technique to try to maximise the current moment to get the highest radiation resistance. They then build out the radation resistance with loss to achieve a specification maximum VSWR for direct feeding at the base with 50 ohm line. It could also be a technique to move part of the loading up to the top of the antenna. I once won a CA shootout with a top-loaded junk box antenna that, in EZNEC, looks something like this: I think the main reason they do that is to improve current distribution. The tighter windings near the top make it act more like a lumped coil which is raised from the base. This should provide a more constant current level up the whip. It's done for the same reason people raise the usual coils used on a bugcatcher , or whatever. To improve current distribution. And most don't add any extra loss on purpose. Most add a extra small winding at the base to act as a matching coil. If you take one of those helical whips, IE: hamstick, etc, and add a longer stinger whip, you will have a pretty decent antenna. I used a 20m hamstick on 40m, by adding a 4-5 ft stinger and it worked very well. Almost as well as the typical bugcatcher. But I later rebuilt that antenna by stripping the helical windings, adding a bigger "lumped" coil, and it was pretty much electrically the same as a bugcatcher. It works all bands 80-10 now. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|