Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
Once could have been a mistake. Twice is deliberate, dishonest
manipulation.

Absolutely nothing dishonest about it.

Once you make a mistake, Ian, it doesn't matter what
you say after the mistake. What I disagreed with was
your mistake and didn't bother quoting the rest. I
believe that is part of the netnews guidelines.

So I challenge you again. Given a two wavelength
slinky dipole, please use your lumped constant
model to predict the current in the antenna.

Of course, you cannot and will not do that.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com