Cecil Moore wrote:
I have *NEVER* said "power is moving", at least not in this
century.

Do you imagine that the caviat "not in this century" might make the
statement at least partially true?

That is just your straw man raising its ugly head
yet once again.

Was it not raised when you brought the definition of 'transfer' back
into the discussion - again this century?

ac6xg

Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
I have *NEVER* said "power is moving", at least not in this
century.

Do you imagine that the caviat "not in this century" might make the
statement at least partially true?

In the 20th century, I did believe in power flow but you
convinced me that I was wrong and I changed my mind. I
have not believed in power flow during the 21st century.


That is just your straw man raising its ugly head
yet once again.

Was it not raised when you brought the definition of 'transfer' back
into the discussion - again this century?

I will keep bringing it up until you furnish the definition
that you are using for the word. That you absolutely refuse
to provide a definition means it is nothing but your gut
feeling about the matter.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com