Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AI4QJ wrote:
I also eventually agreed that I went too far to suggest one *could* tell the differences. I could go back and find the post where I made that retraction but it might take some time. It was a 'by the way' sort of thing; it seemed to be almost corroborative but it was definitely was incorrect although not very important in the overall discussion. Thank you for having corrected me before. I thought I previously had submitted to the lashes of the whoop haung (or whatever they call that thing at ARRL that you use to punish hams). Thanks, I had missed that posting. Did you also conclude, then, that all the boxes contain the same number of "electrical degrees"? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
Did you also conclude, then, that all the boxes contain the same number of "electrical degrees"? Yes, all the boxes contain the same number of electrical degrees. That's why we can calculate the number of electrical degrees at the impedance discontinuity. Hint: That number of electrical degrees for a capacitor is the same as the gamma angle for the reflection coefficient. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|