| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 26, 5:16 pm, Danny Richardson wrote:
Jim, Check this one out. http://www.degendesigns.com/Downloads/TheEasyWay.PDF Danny, K6MHE Hi, I like the article. One question about feed lines. If coax is 50 ohms and twin lead has 300 ohms. Why is the twin lead consideres less lossy than coax? I had thought that higher ohms meant higher impedance and I thought higher impedance means higher loss. Obviously I have not read the chapter on transmission lines yet ;-), so I may have that all wrong. Also, in the article, I liked the part about before 1950, no one even heard about swr, and that antennas with high swr were working just fine. But I make 2 assumptions: 1) I'm thinking, even if they didn't know or care about swr, they still had to cut their dipoles for the band they were transmitting on. 2) I still would not want to use a 10m dipole and transmit 100 watts on 80 without at least using a tuner. Am I correct in these assumptions? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA - MFJ-941E Tuner with Ten-Tec Dummy Load | Equipment | |||
| FA - MFJ-941E Tuner with Ten-Tec Dummy Load | Swap | |||
| FA: MFJ-941E Antenna Tuner | Swap | |||
| FA: $12.00 PALOMAR PT-340 "TUNER TUNER" HELPS TUNE YOUR TUNER | Equipment | |||
| FA: $12.00 PALOMAR PT-340 "TUNER TUNER" HELPS TUNE YOUR TUNER | Equipment | |||