Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote: ... It will, will it? I'm waiting for you to prove it. Do you really expect it to be resonant at the right frequency? This is getting tiresome, Cecil. I guess you think that stating things over and over again will make them come true. Oh, well, it's my fault. I shouldn't waste my time trying to get blood out of a turnip. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH You mean at the frequency where the 600 line length is 53 degrees and the 100 line 10 degrees length ... well, I guess that already answers your own question, doesn't it?--but then, you should have already knew that ... JS I'm beginning to see why Roy plonked you, Smith, or whatever your present pseudonym is. It looks as if you've been taking opacity lessons from Art. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
The Tower still standing ???? | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |