Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Donaly wrote:
O.k., now prove it using standard transmission line theory. You can say it over and over again, but if you can't give anyone a reason to believe it, you're just blowing hot air. Does that imply that you are incapable of verifying it for yourself? - incapable of proving it wrong? I went through the math in a reply to Dan and I have verified it using MicroSmith. IMO, these dual-Z0 shortened stubs are best understood using the Smith Chart. Let's see how much you have learned. If we make the 600 ohm section equal in length to the 100 ohm section, how many physical degrees of length will each section have to be to achieve 1/4 wavelength resonance? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
The Tower still standing ???? | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |