Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 12, 5:52 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: -- IF there's a phase change at the impedance discontinuity (which I assume means the black box terminals), it's the same for all four (your three and my one) black boxes. To see exactly how wrong that statement really is let's take a look at two of the cases. (1) with a -j567 ohm impedor (capacitor) connected inside the black box to the existing 43.4 degrees of 600 ohm line external to the black box. (2) with 46.6 degrees of 600 ohm line connected to the existing 43.4 degrees of 600 ohm line external to the black box. The reflection coefficient for (1) at the black box terminals is 1.0 at -93 degrees, i.e. 100% reflection at that point with an accompanying phase angle shift. The reflection coefficient for (2) at the black box terminals is 0 at 0 degrees, i.e. no reflections at that point and no accompanying phase angle shift at that point. To assert that the phase change at the black box terminals is the same in both of those cases is ridiculous. In case (1) it is 93 degrees. In case (2) it is zero degrees. So, when you are presented with 43.6 degrees of 600 ohm line connected to a black box (about which you know nothing of the internals) which provides an impedance -j567, do you answer the question: What is the impedance at the input of the 600 ohm line? Or do you refuse, because you do not know what phase change is occuring at the terminals? ....Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
The Tower still standing ???? | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |