Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 13, 5:57 am, Cecil Moore wrote:
It does not seem to be a concept that is particularly useful for the solving of problems. Looks like you haven't thought it through. If one wants to create a shortened dual-Z0 stub with equal lengths of each section of Z0High and Z0Low, here is the corresponding chart for different ratios of Z0High/Z0Low. http://www.w5dxp.com/DualZ0.gif As an example, one can create an electrical 1/4WL stub that is 1/3 the normal physical length by using 600 ohm line and 50 ohm line. There are many ways to create the impedances for matching, each with different advantages. As you point out, one of the benefits of using two different impedance lines is a reduction in material, though, you could go all the way to just using a lumped capacitor and save even more. This reality, however, does not demonstrate any value for the *concept* of phase shift at a discontinuity. For the concept to be useful it should facilitate understanding or problem solving. As far as I can tell, you always solve the problem in the conventional way (change the angle on the Smith chart, un-normalize the impedance, re-normalize the impedance to the new Z0, measure the angle to get to the desired impedance) and then work out the "phase shift" at the discontinuity. It sure looks like additional work that adds no value since the important and useful information has already been derived before computing the "phase shift". As such, I declare it "not particularly useful". ....Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
The Tower still standing ???? | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |