"Dave" wrote in message
news:uQa6j.10850$3W.8630@trndny04...

"Derek" wrote in message
...
On Dec 7, 10:50 am, "Dave" wrote:
"AI4QJ" wrote in message



art has now added gravity to gauss in addition to time... what has he
got in
his gut?? whatever it is i'll take a double!


Dave
"It" is called "courage of his convictions" something you cant
buy.

Do you still say you cant add the variant of time to Gauss's law?.


Derek.

Gauss's law is a law of 'electrostatics' as art so frequently states.
STATICS is static, ie NO current which would be implied by adding a time
component to the charge or field predicted by Gauss's law. If you have a
time variable charge you have a current, if you have a current then you
have to include the magnetic fields, and the curl of the electric field,
and hence end up needing all 4 of Maxwell's equations to define the
complete solution. So yes, i say you can not add time variations to
Gauss's law as it stands alone and completely describe the solution to the
fields produced.

i.e. simple proof. define any shape surface with no charge enclosed in
it. by Gauss's law the net field through that surface must be zero. you
can have charges sitting just outside of it, lets say a single electron is
just outside of one side of the surface. if you integrate the field from
that one electron it goes in one side of the surface and out the other and
all still adds up to zero net field as require by Gauss's law. now for
the hard part.... move the charge a little bit closer to the surface
without going through it. we must all agree that while you are moving it
the electric field strength through the surface closest to the charge is
increasing, so in order for the total flux through the surface to remain
zero the flux moving out on the other side must also increase. BUT
because of the effects of the other 3 Maxwell equations that limit the
speed of propagation of that field to c it can't happen instantaneously.
so for some period of time the net flux through the surface is not zero as
would be require by Gauss alone. reductio ad absurdum, QED, take your new
theory and....




hmmmm, 24 hours and no rebuttal? come on, some of you art suckups that i
haven't plonked yet must surely have a logical reason why this isn't
correct? maybe the new non-newtonian static electrons get magically pushed
through the integration surface and make up for the extra field? oh wait,
then they wouldn't be static any more would they? and where it the
diamagnetic surface that they levitate from?? oh well, back to the 10m
contest, thats even more fun than pinging this group.