On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:12:00 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

the 21st response.

No contrary evidence noted.

Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

the 21st response.

No contrary evidence noted.

For the Nth time, here is again - please explain it.

http://www.w5dxp.com/coil512.ez
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:32:51 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

the 21st response.

No contrary evidence noted.

For the Nth time...
This represents the expected cries of anguish more than correspondence
to the immediate topic with N greater than the 20th question where
formerly Cecil was loath to proceed beyond...

As observed earlier, threads driven by data rarely present the
entertainment that enthralls many to submit upwards to 500 postings.

I see no further data regarding the topic is forthcoming, an expected
outcome, but certainly not Cecil's best option. However, Cecil is the
only one that can fill in the blanks of a measurement that appears
never to have been made. There appear to have been no witnesses that
can independantly supply that data either. As such, nothing is left
to be said that negates my conclusions set forth in this thread as
were drawn from the only data available.

Of course, Cecil could impeach his own data. :-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
For the Nth time...

This represents the expected cries of anguish more than correspondence
to the immediate topic with N greater than the 20th question where
formerly Cecil was loath to proceed beyond...

Allow me to point out that the only thing you have proved
is that I am "loath to proceed" for obvious reasons. What
you are saying in no way proves that I was wrong. I have
just gotten tired of being nibbled to death by the gaggle
of guru geese. Please see my new thread titled:
"Please perform my experiment for yourself"
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com