Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AI4QJ wrote:
As another poster said, there is very high noise at this frequency. The way this radio works is to use the coil as both an antenna and the resonating inductance in the tuned circuit. I have found that, in high noise applications like this, often the best way to get a clear signal is to off-tune the receiving antenna, for example, tuning the receiving circuit to the frequency you need but using a shorter antenna. A 40m antenna often works well for receiving 80m and 160m stations without all the noise. . . Do you mean you can get a better signal/noise ratio with a 40 m antenna on 80 or 160 than with a half wave 80 or 160 meter antenna? If so, what do you suppose the mechanism is by which the shorter antenna distinguishes between signal and noise? I've seen cases where a receiver designed for use with a small whip antenna became overloaded when connected to a decent antenna. Adding attenuation or using a shorter antenna improved the S/N ratio because a lot of the noise was due to intermod from the receiver overloading. I've never seen this with a decent receiver, however. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB Bug Catcher Antenna Coil 80 meter large dia and Cap hat Large dia | Antenna | |||
Large Ferrite Bar Ant. | Shortwave | |||
WTB Bug Catcher Antenna Coil 80 meter large dia and Cap hat Large dia | Swap | |||
Tuned MFJ-1024 Active Antenna | Shortwave | |||
tuned? cobra 7 antenna | CB |