Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:08:44 -0800, Roger wrote:
No, my concept of transmission lines deals fine with linear sources, it is the non-linear constant voltage source and constant current source that can not handle a second source of power arriving at a time later than the original pulse. Hi Roger, That is not the problem of the sources, it is your problem alone in coming to terms with the network. Any reference that reaches deep into the fundamentals of lines and networks begins with the Thevenin source (and at least one off of my shelf delves into two Thevenin sources facing each other). "There are waves of identical frequency traveling in both directions on the line, but their amplitudes and phases are independently variable, and neither can be called "incident" or "reflected" waves." It is notable that the author expressly offers only one set of equations for the distributed voltage and current along a line and distinctly says: "It is worth noting that (8.1) and (8.2) [those equations] are also applicable to Fig. 8-2 below [showing the dual source configuration with deliberate matches], a distinctly different transmission line circuit." What makes it "a distinctly different transmission line circuit" is that it is in fact one source feeding both ends. It settles the hash about frequency, phase, coherence, amplitude, matching, and all the other folderol that attends many of Cecil's jejune postings: "Here a single source supplies signals to both ends of a transmission line section, through networks that terminate the section in its characteristic impedance at each end." As time passes, I will try to improve the concept of the perfect POWER source to see if that can bridge the conceptual differences, but retain the relative simplicity of sine waves adding. The two equations, needing no reference to a constant power source: V(z) = V1· e^-y·z + V2· e^+y·z I(z) = (V1· e^-y·z - V2· e^+y·z) / Zo where z: the distance along a line y = a + jB a: nepers per unit length of line B = 2 · pi / wavelength V1 & V2 are arbitrary voltage phasors to be determined by boundary conditions at the ends of the line. It took very little effort to then proceed to the obvious: "Whenever two waves of identical frequency travel in opposite directions on a transmission line ... the fundamental phenomenon of interference or 'standing waves' occurs. ... exhibits periodic maxima and minima ... in its most striking form when the two oppositely directed waves have equal amplitude and the transmission line system has zero attenuation." Elaborations of stepped pulses of energy had better resolve to identical analysis using the math above, or the strain of elaboration has led to sterile inventions. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew | |||
What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna |