| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roy Lewallen wrote:
But any analysis which isn't valid when driven by a perfect voltage source in series with a resistance (or current source in parallel with a resistance) is fundamentally flawed. Any model that violates the laws of physics is fundamentally flawed. Your model has EM energy sloshing around like water. Your model has EM energy neither flowing into the source nor being reflected. That is a violation of the conservation of energy principle. The SPICE simulation of the circuit I analyzed was, of course, a transient analysis. The source was a perfect voltage source which produced a sine wave beginning at t = 0 and continuously after that, just as in my analysis. For anyone having SPICE, here's the netlist: What is it that you think you have proved? That there is no energy in reflected waves? That EM waves don't move at the speed of light? That the conservation of energy principle is invalid? What? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
| Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
| Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
| Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew | |||
| What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna | |||